Saturday, 1 May 2010

留言轉載: 真正的華尼兹教授?

這是一位著名的馬來醫師的網站, 叫 rightstowrite. 他可說是最關心明福案件的人之一, 曾寫了'反貪局的死亡事件—我的化驗報告' (Death at MACC, My CSI) 共17集.

在他最新的一篇博文: 誰是趙明福 (Teoh Beng Hock, Who?) 中, 有一位叫 Jonathan 的網友寫了一篇長長的留言, 報告關于華尼兹教授與政府的關聯和背景.

我不知道這留言的真實性有多高, 網站的消息我們還是要過濾的, 畢竟真假消息每天都飛來飛去, 更何況那只是一段留言?

比如, 你說華尼兹沒有專業操守還罷, 說到該大學降低水平來頒發文憑以便保住長期顧客就有點爭論性. 英國的大學耶, 還是名校呢. 似乎不太可能. 但是, 如主持這科目的高級人馬有問題就難說.

不過那篇留言值得一讀. 就當故事來看好了.

Be warned: These are only comments on a webpage, though intersting, not sure if it is true, so please read with an open mind.

Vanezis was Regius Professor in Forensics at Glasgow U between 1994 and 2000 something. And Glasgow is the preferred choice for training of both UKM and Health Ministry would-be-pathologists for various reasons then. Glasgow was cheap although a dreary city. There was a substantial Kampong Melayu at Otago Street and around Kelvingrove park. There was a largely friendly Paki community. And for Malaysian scholarship holders there was Vanezis. To be a recognized pathologist in Malaysia you must first then pass your MRCPath and do a substantial attachment with someone famous like Vanezis. But in true Ketuanan style, a shortcut must be found. Glasgow was one of those few places that ran an Msc Forensic Pathology course.

KKM and UKM sent their pathologists there and they come back and get it gazetted as a specialist qualification. As a policy maker (Jusa C and above), you can make your own rules, and get the government to recognize your qualifications. Simple huh. So Vanezis, has a constant flow of students, dungu that they maybe. But dungus pay £9000 a year for two years for an MSc course. The money flows to Glasgow U who are happy with Vanezis and our dungu pathologist are also happy because they get to come back home to be called forensic pathologists with a fat pay and no on calls. But wait.

There is more money to be made. Dungu pathologists screw up or because they are half baked they dont know how to cover their asses or the govt’s asses. What to do? No problem. Call boss to come lahh. Sure come one. Otherwise constant supply of dungu students will stop. Somemore paying him buisness/first class air ticket with fat fees. He will not only come, but will use his reputation and clean up our mess.

So there you are, Peter Vanezis, the cikgu for our dumbo, unethical, cheats who got their pathology degrees via the back door – they have nothing to worry about. Their cikgu is here to clean up the mess. I am surprised the PR fellas never did their homework. Vanezis was never and will never be an independant pathologist like Pornthip is. The MACC should have called in an independent pathologist from the US under whom all our pathologists didn’t train with. Vanezis, sold himself today. His colleagues in the UK will know about this. He is finished.

你認為呢?

15 comments:

Bentoh said...

博大兄,

Dr Rafick 是名男性, 全名 Dr Mohamed Rafick Khan Abdul Rahman (參照 http://rights2write.wordpress.com/author/drrafick/), 一向來都寫評論, 是國際山莊(就是土崩黑區)居民協會主席 :)

leejiajia said...

英国名校又如何?败类总会有的。

大佬:“反秤复民” said...

讲到名校败类,数那个牛精大鹤神第一!

二楼后座-she's lost control ii said...

吊,英国佬和白皮猪都是假绅士伪君子,早就通天啦!

大佬,
那条友仔是因为拿牛头去申请津贴,才被说成是牛津的。

Botak said...

哦,是男性? 到底是男是女? 哈哈, 那我先把性別撒了, 回家看女兒, 其他的回來再談....

Anonymous said...

如果是Dr Rafick 的留言,可信度相當高.

弘农德仁 said...

若是right2write所发表的,可信度是相當高的.可信!可信!

血大夫 said...

事實是
專業文憑已經變成一種買賣
而且是很賺錢的買賣

Botak said...

BENTOH: 嗯....看來我男女不分了.

李家家: 是學校的問題還是一個教授的問題? 看來學校不可能完全不知道.

大佬: 你說那隻被牛打種的雞嗎?

二樓: 有可能是牛X大學. 差一個字.

無名: 不是他, 是他的讀者.

弘農: 不是rightstowrite, 是他的讀者.

血大夫: bingo! 問題就在這裡. 反正馬鏟從來不欠學費, 又不會要求助學金.

各位, 請踴躍轉貼. 時間不多. 就來變成懸案了. 但是此類醫學敗類一定不能讓他有好下場.

moo_t said...

嘿嘿嘿嘿, 圣人不死,大盗不止。现代很多“专业人士”, 就是古代所谓的”圣人“。搞跨华尔街的, 那个不是名大学出身.

我怀疑,其实民联已经去“起底“了,这些资料只会关键的时候出现。政治嘛。

弘农德仁 said...

Brader, 谢谢指正。

Anonymous said...

光头大佬!!Dr Mohamed Rafick Khan Abdul Rahman 是mamak 咧!

Botak said...

吊, 不管啦, 總之是醫生啦, 有好料就去看啦.

Shanghai Lily said...

hi Botakray
something always puzzles me. why is it that such a populated country like China, can accommodate all its primary and secondary school students in one single-secession while here in M'sia,with such huge edn budgets, we still have 2 secessions in schools??

Botak said...

Shanghai Lily: China could be a wrong reference, Thailand would be a better choice for comparison.
Why? Human nature. If an ethnic group is treated fairly and equally they would have been willing to accommodate alien culture and values, or else they would rather stick to their own kind.
2 secessions? Ask the Malay.